Every strategy was use to defeat Imran Khan,
Every strategy was use, but today the constitution, truth and truth have won. Tehreek-e-Insaaf Senator Faisal Javed’s reaction to the Supreme Court verdict. Faisal Javed Khan says that God willing, Imran Khan will return with a two-thirds majority. According to the details.
Tehreek-e-Insaf Senator Faisal Javed’s reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision has come out. The PTI leader says that every tactic was use to defeat Imran Khan. But today the constitution, right and truth have won.
God willing, Imran Khan will return with a two-thirds majority. All we will say is that everyone should avoid arrogance. We want the general elections in the country to be held soon.
Yes, the Supreme Court accepted the request of Pervez Elahi, the Supreme Court ordered the Governor of Punjab to administer the oath of Chief Minister to Pervez Elahi.
Earlier, Deputy Speaker Punjab Assembly’s lawyer Irfan Qadir and PPP’s lawyer Farooq H. Naik did not participate before the three-member bench headed by Chief Justice Umar Atta Bandial during the hearing on the petitions against the order of Deputy Speaker Punjab Assembly. in court proceedings.
It was decide to inform the lawyer of People’s Party Farooq Naik about the boycott of the proceedings. So the Chief Justice, speaking to him, said, “Are you not a party to the case?” During the week of September our priority is to deal with this matter as soon as possible.
Who can give instructions to members? A reading of the Constitution makes it clear that the instructions are give by the parliamentary party. So no further legal arguments are neede to answer this question. The Chief Justice remarked during the hearing that the lawyers for the parties. Should be told what the Constitution does.
Will not allow hindrance in governance, the caretaker cabinet headed by the president was invalidate by the Supreme Court in 1988. The court declared that the cabinet cannot function without the prime minister.
The Chief Justice remarked that in the Article 63A case, no counsel argued on the instructions. The court needs support on the direction of the party leader or on the direction of the parliamentary party.
By voting freely. from the party chief? Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan remarked that under the constitution, the decision of the parliamentary party is implemented by the party chief. No, the decision of the political party is communicate to the parliamentary party, on which it decides.
Ali Zafar explained that during the Musharraf era, the parliamentary leader’s law replaced the party chief, the 18th amendment repealed Pervez Musharraf’s law. Justice Ijazul Hasan also inquired where the word parliamentary leader is use.
Lawyer Ali Zafar said in his arguments that the Political Parties Order 2002 mentions parliamentary party. The word parliamentary leader instead of parliamentary party is contrary to facts.
According to the international news organization, the 3-member bench of. The Supreme Court had reserved the decision. On the order of the Deputy Speaker of the Punjab Assembly.
